Blog Categories
- Admissions Director Q&A
- Admissions Tips
- Campus Chronicles
- Career Services Director Q&A
- Clear Admit Products
- Deadlines
- Essay Topic Analysis
- Essay Topics
- Events
- Financial Aid
- Fridays from the Frontline
- General
- GMAT News
- GMAT Tips
- Interview Reports
- Interview Tips
- MBA News
- Part-Time/Executive MBA
- Rankings
- Tell Us Tuesdays
- Trivia Tuesday
- Twitter Thursdays
- Videos
Clear Admit Videos
Clear Admit Newsletter
Essay Topic Analysis
Berkeley / Haas
Cambridge / Judge
Chicago Booth
CMU / Tepper
Columbia*
Cornell / Johnson
Dartmouth / Tuck
Duke / Fuqua
Georgetown / McDonough
Harvard
IESE
Indian School of Business*
INSEAD
London Business School
MIT / Sloan
Michigan / Ross
Northwestern / Kellogg
NYU / Stern
Oxford / Said
Penn / Wharton
Stanford GSB
UCLA / Anderson
UNC / Kenan-Flagler
USC / Marshall
UT Austin / McCombs
UVA / Darden
Yale SOM
* denotes '13-'14 commentary
GMAT Resources
Program Rankings
Business Week
Economist
Financial Times
Forbes
USNews
Wall Street Journal
Industry Compensation
Investment Banking Compensation
Private Equity Compensation
Sales & Trading Compensation
Management Consulting Compensation
B-School Resources
knowledge@wharton
INSEAD Knowledge
Harvard Working Knowledge
Knowledge @ Emory
Columbia Ideas @ Work
knowledge@ W. P. Carey
Stanford Knowledgebase
Ross Thought in Action
MBA Programs: North America
- Berkeley / Haas
- Boston College / Carroll
- Boston University*
- Carnegie Mellon / Tepper
- Chicago / Booth
- Columbia
- Concordia
- Cornell / Johnson*
- Dartmouth / Tuck
- Duke / Fuqua
- Emory / Goizueta*
- Harvard
- HEC Montreal*
- Indiana / Kelley
- Michigan
- MIT / Sloan
- Northwestern / Kellogg*
- New York / Stern
- North Carolina / Kenan Flagler
- Notre Dame / Mendoza*
- Pennsylvania / Wharton
- Queens*
- Smith / UMD
- Stanford
- Syracuse / Whitman
- Texas / McCombs
- Thunderbird*
- Toronto / Rotman
- Tulane / Freeman
- USC / Marshall*
- UCLA / Anderson
- Vanderbilt / Owen
- Virginia / Darden
- Washington University in St. Louis / Olin
- Western Ontario / Ivey*
- Yale
MBA Programs: The Rest Of The World
- AGSM (Australia) 2
- Cambridge / Judge (UK) 1
- CIEBS (China) 2
- Cheung Kong Graduate School of Business (China) 1
- Cranfield School of Mgmt (UK) 1
- ESADE (Spain) 1 or 2
- HEC (France) 2
- Hult (UK) 1
- IE (Span)
- IESE (Spain) 2
- IMD (Switzerland) 1
- INCAE (Costa Rica) 2
- INSEAD (France) 1
- IPADE (Mexico)
- ISB (India) 1
- London Business School (UK) 2
- Manchester Bus. School (UK) 2
- Melbourne (Australia) 2
- Oxford / Said (UK) 1
- Rotterdam (Netherlands) 1
- Tsinghua IMBA (China) 2
- University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) 1
Archives
GMAT Tips – Getting Ready for Integrated Reasoning: The Scoring!
Jul 11, 2012 | 0 comments
Today’s GMAT tip comes from test prep firm ManhattanGMAT. In this article, they provide helpful information on how to set a target score for the Integrated Reasoning section of the new GMAT. Read on to see what they have to say!
We’ve been talking a lot lately about how to prep for IR, including the idea that we only need a “good enough” score for now because the section is so new that the schools aren’t going to place heavy emphasis on IR right away. One key piece of information, though, has been missing: what’s a “good enough” IR score?
GMAC has just released the first set of percentile rankings for the 1 to 8 IR scoring scale. Here it is:
Percentile Score
94% 8
85% 7
70% 6
54% 5
46% 4
26% 3
17% 2
0% 1
The mean score is a 4.0 / 46th percentile. In general, as with the essays, we want to try to hit or beat the mean. If you’re applying to an extra-competitive program, try to beat the mean, but a 5 (for now) is fine – you don’t need to hit 7 or 8 the first year.
Why? As we’ve discussed before, the schools will be in “data-gathering” mode for at least the first year. They simply don’t know yet how much weight to place on this new section or how valid it will be in helping to distinguish among quality applicants. They’ll gather data on their applicants and admits for the first year or two to help them figure this all out and then they’ll start placing more emphasis on the IR score.
At the same time, you don’t want to completely bomb the section. They might think, “Oh, this student might have given herself an unfair advantage by essentially skipping the IR section, so she was more mentally fresh when she got to quant and verbal. We should discount her quant and verbal scores.”
How do we get that “good enough” score?
The first question everyone will have is: how many questions do I need to answer correctly in order to get a “good enough” score? And, for once, the answer is not going to be “everybody gets about the same number of answers right.” That is how the quant and verbal sections work, but not IR. IR really is based on the percentage of questions answered correctly.
We don’t know yet, though, how many you need to answer correctly in order to hit the various scoring levels – we just don’t have enough data yet. But I’m going to go out on a limb and guess: aim to get half of the questions right (or more).
IR is a pretty even mix of quant and verbal reasoning skills, so weight your attention more heavily towards your stronger area. Really good at CR and RC? Bail more quickly when you see a really hard quant-based IR question. Alternatively, is math your thing? Then be ready to guess and move on more quickly when you’ve got a really long, convoluted text with reasoning-based questions.
Anything else?
Yes, one other very important detail: you also need to be prepared “enough” for IR that it won’t overly tire you out before you get to the main event (quant and verbal). Mental fatigue manifests as a decreased ability to concentrate, the feeling that you aren’t “getting” what you’re reading and you have to read it again, an impatience to be done with the test already and I don’t care what the answer is, or significant difficulty in making decisions, to the point of feeling “paralyzed” on a question.
If you’re not prepared “enough” for IR, you’ll be making your life harder when you reach the quant and verbal. I’m sure you’ve noticed that I keep putting that word “enough” in parentheses. Here’s why: you’re not actually trying to get everything right, so when you see something that’s just way too hard, you make a guess and keep going without stressing about it at all. Not only doesn’t it matter that you’re probably going to get it wrong, but that realization is actually actively in your favor right now (because at least you’re getting it wrong quickly and without too much mental effort). Answer what you can, guess where you can’t, don’t stress about any of it, and finish the section still relatively mentally fresh.
Key takeaways for IR:
(1) Know what your goal is: to get a good enough score and to be prepared enough that IR doesn’t wipe you out mentally before you get to the more important later sections.
(2) Build some flexibility into your timeframe and prep plan. The IR question types are different enough that some people will find they need more prep time than they might have expected. Others will think, wow, I wish the whole test were like this! You won’t know until you dive in and start studying, but be prepared to slow down and take a bit more time if IR is really throwing you for a loop.
(3) Your actual prep process will be very similar to what you have already been doing for quant and verbal – same kinds of prep materials, same kinds of study activities, same kinds of analysis of your work, and so on. This will all just be happening with new question types, that’s all.
* GMAT is a trademark of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of the name or any material does not imply endorsement by GMAC.
For more information on ManhattanGMAT, download Clear Admit’s independent guide to the leading test preparation companies here. This FREE guide includes coupons for discounts on test prep services at ten different firms!
Related articles
- GMAC Launches New GMAT Featuring Integrated Reasoning Section (clearadmit.com)
- GMAT Tips – The Next-Gen GMAT: Multi-Source Reasoning (clearadmit.com)
Posted in: GMAT Tips
Featured Products
Upcoming Deadlines and Events
-
May27Mon
-
May29Wed
-
Jun1Sat
-
Jun3Mon
-
Jun12Wed
-
Jun23Sun
-
Jul18Thu
Connect With Us
Recent Tweets
- RT @msbgu: Happy Faculty Friday, everyone! Learn a bit about Neeru Paharia's research and work! http://t.co/wzmiz7AD40 #, May 24
- Applying to Stanford GSB this fall? The adcom released the 2013-2014 #MBA admissions essay topics! http://t.co/po0XLYxyQt #, May 24
- Good news for future MBAs: GMAC 2013 Corporate Recruiters Survey shows employer hiring is up 4% for MBA grads! http://t.co/E5yHm3Coqv #, May 24
Interview Reports
Recently submitted interview field reports from our archive. Submit a write-up of your interview experience.
-
5/17/2013
Wharton MBA Admissions Interview Questions: Round 2 / Group Interview with Second Year Student / On Campus -
5/15/2013
Tuck MBA Admissions Interview Questions: EA Round / AdCom / New Delhi -
5/14/2013
Yale SOM MBA Admissions Interview Questions: Round 3 / Video interview -
5/08/2013
Yale SOM MBA Admissions Interview Questions: Round 3 / Video interview -
5/02/2013
Chicago Booth MBA Admissions Interview Questions: Round 3 / Second year student / On campus
MBA Admissions Mashup
Beat The GMAT Forums
- Ask Clear Admit :: RE: Profile Evaluation - MS Finance Programs
- Ask Clear Admit :: RE: Should I re-apply to McCombs
- Ask Clear Admit :: Profile evaluation and suggested schools
- Ask Clear Admit :: GMAT 660/5 years Experience/ 3.8 GPA (Indian)
- Ask Clear Admit :: RE: Profile evaluation- GMAT-760(Q50,V42)
Wall Street Oasis Forums
BW Business Schools
The BusinessWeek Discussion Boards are another way to learn about the issues applicants face. Clear Admit hosts the Ask Clear Admit thread, which should help answer your questions.
Wharton Student2Student
Best of Blogging
Applicationist
Ccatcher
Fortune 800
MBA Dilemma
My MBA Dreamz
Pyarapopat
Roller Coaster
The Senator
Str1der
Unfathomable
Top Student Bloggers 2012
Bayo
Darden Poet
Ellipser
Howie
Jeremy
Jonathan
Julianne
MBAhut
Night Owl
Parker



