![]() ![]() |
||||||||||||
|
APPLICANT RESOURCES
Admissions Director Q&A Clear Admit School Guides Clear Admit Career Guides Clear Admit Strategy Series Clear Admit Interview Guides Below are the upcoming deadlines for admission to top-tier schools. Feb 10: INSEAD R3 Mar 1: Michigan / Ross R3 Mar 3: CBS Mar 3: LBS R3 Mar 4: Kellogg R3 Mar 8: Cambridge / Judge R4 Mar 8: CMU / Tepper R3 Mar 9: Duke / Fuqua R3 Mar 9: Penn / Wharton R3 Mar 10: Berkeley / Hass R4 Mar 10: Chicago Booth R3 Mar 10: Yale SOM R3 Mar 15: NYU / Stern R3 Mar 17: UCLA / Anderson R3 Mar 19: UNC / Kenan-Flagler R4 Mar 30: Cornell / Johnson R4 Mar 31: UVA / Darden R3 Mar 31: INSEAD R4 Apr 1: UT-Austin / McCombs Apr 2: Dartmouth / Tuck R3 Apr 2: Oxford / Saїd R3 Apr 7: Stanford GSB R4 Apr 8: Harvard R3 Apr 14: CBS Essay Topic Analysis Use categories to access all that has been written on each of the topics. We have categorized by school and by subject matter.
Interview Reports MBA.com Manhattan GMAT GMAT Club Princeton Review Test Prep New York Kaplan Beat The GMAT Knewton Writing Resources Guide to Grammar and Writing The Internet Grammar of English English Usage, Style and Composition The Economist Style Guide Paradigm Online Writing Assistant School Rankings The following resources should be useful to those who want to research the careers open to them after (or before) earning an MBA. Vault.com Wetfeet
Business School Resources
If an MBA Program is not listed, please e-mail and we will be happy to list it. Berkeley / Haas Boston College / Carroll Carnegie Mellon / Tepper Chicago Columbia Concordia Cornell / Johnson Dartmouth / Tuck Duke / Fuqua Emory / Goizueta Harvard HEC Montreal Indiana / Kelley Michigan MIT / Sloan Northwestern / Kellogg New York / Stern North Carolina / Kenan Flagler Notre Dame / Mendoza Pennsylvania / Wharton Queens Stanford Syracuse / Whitman Texas / McCombs Thunderbird Toronto USC / Marshall UCLA / Anderson Vanderbilt / Owen Virginia / Darden Washington University in St. Louis / Olin Western Ontario / Ivey Yale MBA Programs: Rest of the World As there is some variety in the length of international MBA programs, we have denoted the length of the program next to its name (1 = one year; 2 = 2 years). If an MBA Program is not listed, please e-mail and we will be happy to list it. AGSM (Australia) 2 Cambridge / Judge (UK) 1 CIEBS (China) 2 Cheung Kong Graduate School of Business (China) 1 Cranfield School of Mgmt (UK) 1 ESADE (Spain) 1 or 2 HEC (France) 2 Hult (UK) 1 IESE (Spain) 2 IMD (Switzerland) 1 INCAE (Costa Rica) 2 INSEAD (France) 1 IPADE (Mexico) ISB (India) 1 London Business School (UK) 2 Manchester Bus. School (UK) 2 Melbourne (Australia) 2 Oxford / Said (UK) 1 Rotterdam (Netherlands) 1 Tsinghua IMBA (China) 2 University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) 1 Additional Resources Here we link a host of additional resources available across the web. E-mail info@clearadmit.com to have resources added to this list. AACSB International Association of MBAs Beyond Grey Pinstripes EFMD gradschools.com (worldwide) Infozee International Student Loans mba.com (GMAT Scores) MBAInfo mbaleague.blogspot.com MBAzone MBA Jungle TOEFL Top MBA MBA Tipline We encourage admissions officers, students and applicants to alert us of interesting news and developments, please send an email to news@clearadmit.com so we can blog it. Blog Archive
|
Get a $10 Amazon.com Gift Card! Contribute your MBA interview reports to the Clear Admit Wiki. Taking the GMAT? Download our free, independent guide to the leading test prep companies - includes coupons for test prep savings! Sunday, December 06, 2009 GMAT Practice Question: Modifier Madness: Breaking Down a Sentence Correction Problem Today’s GMAT tip comes from the folks at test prep firm ManhattanGMAT. As a follow-up to another recent GMAT article, in this article, ManhattanGMAT instructor Stacey Koprince breaks down another example of a GMATPrep® Sentence Correction (SC) question: This week, we’re going to analyze a particularly tough GMATPrep® Sentence Correction question. First, set your timer for 1 minute and 15 seconds and try the problem! “Research has shown that when speaking, individuals who have been blind from birth and have thus never seen anyone gesture nonetheless make hand motions just as frequently and in the same way as sighted people do, and that they will gesture even when conversing with another blind person. “A) have thus never seen anyone gesture nonetheless make hand motions just as frequently and in the same way as sighted people do, and that “B) have thus never seen anyone gesture but nonetheless make hand motions just as frequently and in the same way that sighted people do, and “C) have thus never seen anyone gesture, that they nonetheless make hand motions just as frequently and in the same way as sighted people do, and “D) thus they have never seen anyone gesture, but nonetheless they make hand motions just as frequently and in the same way that sighted people do, and that “E) thus they have never seen anyone gesture nonetheless make hand motions just as frequently and in the same way that sighted people do, and” Okay, have you got your answer? Now, let’s dive into this thing! What did you think when you read the original sentence? This is a very tough problem; when I read the sentence the first time, I actually had to stop and try to strip the sentence down to its basic core, then figure out how the modifiers fit. Until I did that, I couldn’t go any further. First, we have “research has shown,” a subject-verb pair. That’s the start of the core. The research has shown some things. What are those things (in simple form)? In the following sentence, the words in <brackets> are my simplification of the sentence; these words do not represent the original sentence. “Research has shown THAT when speaking, <certain>¹ individuals nonetheless make hand motions <in a certain way>², and THAT <when speaking>³ they will gesture <in another way>4.” 1<certain> takes the place of “who have been blind from birth and have thus never seen anyone gesture.” 2<in a certain way> takes the place of “just as frequently and in the same way as sighted people do.” 3<when speaking> is implied by parallelism; this second thing is something that occurs when speaking, just as the first thing is something that occurs when speaking. This parallelism is indicated by the second instance of the word “that” and is reinforced by the pronoun “they,” which refers to the subject (individuals) of the first “that” clause. 4<in another way> takes the place of “even when conversing with another blind person.” So what we’ve really got is: “Research has shown THAT when speaking, <certain> individuals nonetheless make <certain> hand motions, and THAT they will gesture <in a certain way>.” Simplify that even more: “Research has shown THAT X, and THAT Y.” (X and Y are parallel and are both things that the research has shown.) In the original sentence, the main word in X is “individuals” and the main word in Y is “they,” so we already have proper parallelism. Are the other four choices also correct just at the core level of the sentence? Part of the core is not underlined: “Research has shown THAT X.” We know, then, that the Y part should be introduced with another THAT (in order to indicate that these two parts, X and Y, should be parallel). Choices B, C, and E all omit the THAT in front of Y, so they are not correct. D also uses the core structure “and THAT Y,” so D is okay as far as that issue is concerned. How do the rest of A and D compare? A begins “have thus never seen” while D begins “thus they have never seen.” What’s the major difference? D includes the subject “they” while A omits a subject. Do we want a subject here? Now we need to dive into one of the modifiers. “individuals who have been blind from birth and have thus never seen anyone gesture nonetheless make” As we discussed earlier, “individuals” is a subject; the matching verb is “make”: “individuals nonetheless make <certain> hand motions.” The words in between “individuals” and “nonetheless” are modifiers – and because we have two separate modifiers connected by the word “and,” we need to make those two modifiers parallel. “Individuals who J and K nonetheless make” A: “Individuals who [have been blind from birth] and [have thus never seen anyone gesture] nonetheless make” D: “Individuals who [have been blind from birth] and [thus they have never seen anyone gesture], but nonetheless they make” So, are they both properly parallel? The J modifier is not part of the underline, so we know that the structure of K has to match the existing structure of J. J’s main construction is a verb in the present-perfect tense, so K should have the same structure. In choice A, K does begin with a present-perfect verb, but in choice D, K beings with a noun (“they”). That’s not parallel. Eliminate D. Now, we’re down to one answer choice. The correct answer is A. There are other ways we could have eliminated answers. For example, choices B and D both use the phrase “but nonetheless” to indicate a contrast. Each word indicates a contrast by itself, so using both words together is redundant. There’s another split between “just as frequently and in the same way as” and “just as frequently and in the same way that.” Which one is right? The word “and” once again indicates parallelism, so there’s something parallel about the part before and the part after the “and.” Try each part individually. “She runs just as frequently as he skis.” That’s fine. Can we say “She runs just as frequently he skis?” No – we need that second “as” after the word “frequently.” The full phrase is “just as frequently as.” So that’s why we have parallelism in this sentence! In the structure “just as frequently and in the same way as,” the second “as” applies to both parts (“just as frequently as” and “in the same way as”). We can’t use “just as frequently and in the same way than” because that would leave us with either “just as frequently” (with no second “as”) or “just as frequently than” – neither of which is correct. The major take-aways here: (1) when doing SC, first attack the errors that you know how to do and reuse your prior analysis as much as you can; you may not have to use all of the errors / differences in order to find the right answer! (2) scan SC answer choices vertically to find differences; don’t read horizontally (3) know how to recognize and properly construct noun modifiers and adverbial modifiers (4) watch out for parallelism markers – the markers are often little words but they can make a big difference! * GMATPrep® question courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this question does not imply endorsement by GMAC. For more information on ManhattanGMAT, download Clear Admit’s independent guide to the leading test preparation companies here. This FREE guide includes coupons for discounts on test prep services at nine different firms! Leave a Reply |
ACTIVE CONTENT Clear Admit's Recent Posts
MBA Twitter Index! We've created the MBA Admissions Twitter Index, a directory of applicants, current MBA students and b-schools on Twitter.Wiki MBA Admissions WikiThe Clear Admit Wiki is designed to allow b-school applicants to share their experiences through the application process. You can learn from others' experiences and contribute your own reports to the community. Below are the five most popular pages in the wiki: Wharton Interview Field Reports HBS Interview Field Reports Kellogg Interview Field Reports Chicago Interview Field Reports Columbia Interview Field Reports Discussion Boards BusinessWeek ForumsThe BusinessWeek Discussion Boards are another way to learn about the issues applicants face. Clear Admit hosts the Ask Clear Admit thread, which should help answer your questions. Here is a link to the original interface (for those of you who didn't like the recent upgrade). Also, here are the five most recent discussions taking place in the forum: Clear Admit is a featured expert in the BeatTheGMAT forums, answering questions from applicants across the globe. Feel free to ask us your questions in this forum! Here are the most recent posts: Clear Admit manages the Applying section of the StudyLink MBA discussion boards. Below are the five most recent posts to the GMAT Club message boards.
The student-2-student Discussion Boards are managed by Wharton. Here are the five most recent discussions. School-Hosted Blogs Straight from the source: aggregated posts from students and administration. Below are the seven most recent posts in school-hosted blogs. Individuals' Blogs A selection of the latest updates to MBA blogs compiled by Hella.MBA Applicants Bloggers by School The following are links to bloggers at each of the schools listed.Chicago Columbia Dartmouth / Tuck Duke / Fuqua Harvard Kellogg Michigan MIT / Sloan New York / Stern North Carolina / Chapel Hill Stanford Virginia / Darden Wharton Yale ESADE IESE INSEAD London Business School Community Blogs Bshoolers.comCommunity blog with MBA student and alum contributors. Forté Foundation MBA Diaries Video blog entries posted by women MBA students. Owen Bloggers Independent blog with content by Vanderbilt MBA students. Best of Blogging 2008-2009 Top Ten:
Best of Blogging 2007-2008 Top Ten:
|
||||||||||