School Guides
Clear Admit School GuidesBecome an expert on your target schools overnight! Get the program-specific details you need to craft essays that stand out. See how schools compare head-to-head in key areas like recruiting, curricular structure, elective offerings and more. Available for immediate download. As featured in the Economist.
CLEAR ADMIT NEWSLETTER

Enter your email address to join our Newsletter!
 
 
ADMISSIONS DIRECTOR Q&A

Below are links to Clear Admit's exclusive interviews with MBA admissions directors at leading programs.


More Admissions Director Q&A's
CAREER SERVICES Q&A

Below are links to Clear Admit's exclusive interviews with MBA career services at leading programs.


More Career Services Q&A's

Categories

Interview Reports

A selection of interview field reports from fellow applicants posted to the MBA Admissions Wiki. Add your reports when you are finished with your interviews.
Chicago
Columbia
Dartmouth / Tuck
Duke / Fuqua
Harvard
Kellogg
Michigan / Ross
MIT / Sloan
Stanford
UNC / Chapel Hill
Virginia / Darden
Wharton
London Business School

MBA Tipline

We encourage admissions officers, students and applicants to alert us of interesting news and developments, please send an email to news@clearadmit.com so we can blog it.

Writing Resources

Rankings are a good way to start your research on various MBA Programs. Keep in mind each uses a different methodology.
Business Week
Economist
Financial Times
Forbes
USNews
Wall Street Journal

Program Rankings

The following are business resources offered by a variety of leading Business Schools. It's useful to subscribe to these resources, especially for the schools to which you are applying.
knowledge@wharton
INSEAD Knowledge
Harvard Working Knowledge
Knowledge @ Emory
Columbia Ideas @ Work
knowledge@ W. P. Carey
Stanford Knowledgebase
Ross Thought in Action

MBA Programs: The Rest of the World

As there is some variety in the length of international MBA programs, we have denoted the length of the program next to its name (1 = one year; 2 = 2 years). If an MBA Program is not listed, please e-mail and we will be happy to list it.

Additional Resources

Archives

Applying to Business School?
Contact us now for a free assessment of your MBA candidacy.

Taking the GMAT?
Download our free, independent guide to 10 leading test prep companies – includes coupons for hundreds of dollars of savings at leading test prep firms!

Workbook Wednesdays: R You Divisible? Answer!

Here is the answer to yesterday’s Challenge Question, brought to you by Manhattan GMAT!

Question

This week’s challenge problem is a Data Sufficiency question.
If P, Q, R, and S are positive integers, and , is R divisible by 5 ?

(1) P is divisible by 140

(2) , where x is a positive integer

(A) Statement (1) alone is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
(B) Statement (2) alone is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
(C) BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
(D) Each statement ALONE is sufficient.
(E) Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

Answer

Let’s begin by analyzing the information given to us in the question:
If P, Q, R, and S are positive integers, and , is R divisible by 5 ?It is often helpful on the GMAT to rephrase equations so that there are no denominators. We can do this my cross-multiplying as follows:

Now let’s analyze Statement (1) alone: P is divisible by 140.

Most GMAT divisibility problems can be solved by breaking numbers down to their prime factors (this is called a “prime factorization”).

The prime factorization of 140 is: .

Thus, if P is divisible by 140, it is also divisible by all the prime factors of 140. We know that P is divisible by 2 twice, by 5, and by 7. However, this gives us no information about R so Statement (1) is not sufficient to answer the question.

Next, let’s analyze Statement (2) alone: , where x is a positive integer.

From this, we can see that the prime factorization of Q looks something like this: Therefore, we know that 7 is the only prime factor of Q. However, this gives us no information about R so Statement (2) is not sufficient to answer the question.

Finally, let’s analyze both statements taken together:

From Statement (1), we know that P has 5 as one of its prime factors. Since 5 is a factor of P and since P is a factor of PS, then by definition, 5 is a factor of PS.

Recall that the question told us that . From this, we can deduce that PS must have the same factors as QR. Since 5 is a factor of PS, 5 must also be a factor of QR.

From Statement (2), we know that 7 is the only prime factor of Q. Therefore, we know that 5 is NOT a factor of Q. However, we know that 5 must be a factor of QR. The only way this can be the case is if 5 is a factor of R.

Thus, by combining both statements we can answer the question: Is R divisible by 5? Yes, it must be divisible by 5. Since BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient, the correct answer is C.

Share

Comments are closed.