Posted by Clear Admit on August 23, 2007, at 8:44 am
Posted in: Admissions Tips As many of our readers are aware, letters of recommendation are a central part of the application process. Following our discussion on how to identify the ideal recommender, today we would like to take a look at how to handle the snags that often arise for applicants in unique employment situations.
The applicant who is most likely to have trouble finding a suitable recommender is either self-employed or works in his or her family’s business. First, self-employed entrepreneurs by their very nature do not have a direct supervisor. Similarly, an applicant who works for the family business may have trouble finding a non-related supervisor, or someone who can offer a truly objective opinion.
Applicants who find themselves in this dilemma should not despair. Some applicants might be in a position to solicit a letter from a client or customer with whom they have worked extensively. In an ongoing relationship like this one, the applicant is accountable to the client and in this sense the client may act as a supervisor. A letter from a client or customer works best, of course, when the relationship has been intensive and ongoing; the writer should be familiar with the applicant’s responsibilities and the way he fulfills them, as well as his career trajectory.
Another option is to look to former supervisors for a letter of recommendation. This is a great option for an applicant who has maintained a close relationship with a previous employer. In this scenario, it is important that the applicant has kept the recommender informed about any developments in his career goals. This way, the letter will be oriented towards the future, even if it draws on anecdotes from the past.
For applicants who have pursued extensive community involvement outside of work, yet another recommendation option may exist within a volunteer organization. Someone who has contributed to a nonprofit for several years, and has taken on responsibilities at the organizational level would be in a great position to explore this option. Again, an applicant in this position should look for a recommender who ranks above him in the organization’s hierarchy and has first-hand knowledge of his contributions.
Following this criteria, in conjunction with some of the more general guidelines mentioned earlier, applicants can wind up with insightful, enthusiastic recommendations that bolster their entire applications!
Posted by Clear Admit on August 22, 2007, at 12:21 pm
Posted in: Essay Topic Analysis , School: Dartmouth / Tuck Tuck’s set of application essays for this season is identical to last year’s, suggesting a consistent focus on an applicant’s unique characteristics, leadership potential and interpersonal behaviors. The program’s instructions with respect to length are also the same, stating that there are no formal length limits, but that most applicants use 500 words per essay “on average.” This provides a bit more leeway than schools whose essays have explicit word counts, but it would still be wise to avoid exceeding or coming short of this mark by very many words.
Let’s take a closer look at each of the school’s essays:
Essay 1: Why is an MBA a critical next step toward your short- and long-term career goals? Why is Tuck the best MBA program for you?
This is a rather straightforward career goal essay. The one way that it differs from those of most other schools is that rather than simply inquiring about the basis of an applicant’s interest in the program, Tuck wants to hear the reasons it might be the best of the candidate’s options. Navigating this issue will require a fair amount of research, as it will be important to identify some features that are truly unique to Tuck and very relevant to one’s goals, background and/or interests.
Essay 2: Tuck defines leadership as “inspiring others to strive and enabling them to accomplish great things.” Describe a time when you exercised such leadership. Discuss the challenges you faced and the results you achieved. What characteristics helped you to be effective, and what areas do you feel you need to develop in order to be a better leader?
This is a tall order for an (approximately) 500 word essay. One great goal to keep in mind is to maintain a balance between the individual and the external. In other words, an applicant might set the scene by offering detailed information about the setting in which he or she led by inspiring others: the financial importance of the project, or perhaps the challenging makeup of a team of coworkers. Of course, ultimately applicants would offer concrete information about how their efforts affected others, and eventually the organization’s bottom line. These descriptions could then be balanced with more reflective observations about the applicant’s own thought process and, in the end, personal development.
Essay 3: Discuss the most difficult constructive criticism or feedback you have received. How did you address it? What have you learned from it?
Though this question will elicit a different sort of story from other schools’ prompts about a failure or setback, the major themes of growth and learning are similar. In addition to recounting the steps you took to address the issue that had been raised (and briefly explaining why it was an issue to begin with), commenting on the way you reacted to this difficult feedback could be a great way to demonstrate maturity and a sincere interest in improvement. That is, the element of communication implicit in “constructive criticism or feedback” provides applicants with an excellent opportunity to show themselves interacting with others, perhaps even under trying circumstances.
Essay 4: Tuck seeks candidates of various backgrounds who can bring new perspectives to our community. How will your unique personal history, values, and/or life experiences contribute to the culture at Tuck?
Tuck is trying to understand the potential value of applicants’ knowledge and interests, and also the way they think about the world. Rather than making the common claim that they can bring a unique perspective to the classroom, candidates are encouraged to offer insightful details about what differentiates them from others in the applicant pool. Discussing the way your individual perspectives would affect this close-knit community (in a modest manner, of course) can really bolster your response here, since the adcom is sincerely looking for applicants who will change the program for the better. For that reason, applicants who outline the specific contributions they could make to the Tuck culture, the ways in which they intend to make them, and the reasons they are uniquely equipped to do so, will make a positive and lasting impression on the adcom.
Posted by Clear Admit on August 22, 2007, at 8:43 am
Posted in: General , Workbook Wednesdays Welcome to another edition of Workbook Wednesdays, where we take a shot at one of Manhattan GMAT’s most challenging quantitative practice questions. Take a look at the problem below, and be sure to check back in with us tomorrow for an explanation of the answer!
Question
Kate and Danny each have $10. Together, they flip a fair coin 5 times. Every time the coin lands on heads, Kate gives Danny $1. Every time the coin lands on tails, Danny gives Kate $1. After the five coin flips, what is the probability that Kate has more than $10 but less than $15?

Posted by Clear Admit on August 21, 2007, at 2:19 pm
Posted in: Admissions Tips , General Following up on our initial posts pointing out the bschooltalk video series as a generally great resource for applicants, we wanted to take a moment today to highlight the two most recent installments.
Last week’s edition covered the subject of recommendation letters, with representatives from schools like Wharton and Cornell weighing in on the role these documents play in the admissions process and sharing some insight on what the admissions committee seeks to learn from a supervisor’s input. Clear Admit’s Graham Richmond is also on hand to offer guidelines on recommender selection in light of the school’s interests and expectations.
Meanwhile, this week’s podcast features a panel of b-school insiders from Anderson and Tuck, among other programs, and covers the role of community service in an applicant’s candidacy. The segment sheds light on the reasons that engagement in one’s surroundings outside of work is of interest to an MBA admissions committee, and offers some interesting information on allowance for cultural differences and strategies for using one’s outside pursuits, whether service-based or not, to one’s best advantage in the application process.
Posted by Clear Admit on August 21, 2007, at 7:43 am
Posted in: School: Duke / Fuqua , School: Penn / Wharton , Trivia Tuesday It’s time once again for Trivia Tuesday, our regular exploration of the special programs and opportunities that differentiate the leading business schools. In a previous Trivia Tuesday column, we discussed health care education at several MBA programs, with an emphasis on Wharton’s Health Care Systems Major. This week we follow-up on that discussion with a more in-depth look at Fuqua’s Health Sector Management program.
Duke University began offering healthcare education in 1930 alongside its opening of the Duke Hospital. In the more than three-quarters of a century since then, the Health Sector Management program (HSM) has evolved into one of the preeminent healthcare management education programs in the nation, alongside Wharton’s Health Care Systems major. Today, the HSM program enrolls over one-fifth of each Daytime MBA class, making it the largest healthcare program affiliated with a leading business school.
Fuqua’s affiliation with Duke University and location in the North Carolina Research Triangle area are major contributors to the strength of the HSM program. The Duke University Medical Center and Health System is a leader in biomedical research, education, and healthcare delivery, while the HSM program’s relationships with area biotech and pharmaceutical companies keep students and faculty connected to the rapidly changing healthcare industry.
Students enter the HSM program from a variety of backgrounds; though the program does not require prior health sector experience, it does look for a strong commitment to the healthcare field among all student participants. As with Wharton’s Health Care Systems major, application to Fuqua’s HSM program is through the MBA admissions process, with HSM applicants asked to indicate their interest in pursuing the HSM Certificate in a special section of the application.
Once enrolled, HSM students spend the first year completing the standard core curriculum before beginning the coursework that leads to the HSM Certificate. To earn the Certificate, HSM students complete four HSM core courses and three healthcare elective courses. All seven of HSM courses count as elective credit towards the MBA degree requirements. This is a slightly heavier courseload than required by Wharton’s healthcare program, which asks students to complete two foundations courses and three healthcare electives.
In addition to providing students with the tools and skills to be successful in established health sector organizations, the HSM program also allows students to combine their health sector studies with the study of entrepreneurship and community involvement. For instance, HSM students may participate in the Engineering World Health program, using their skills to improve healthcare facilities in an impoverished community in Costa Rica, or compete in the healthcare track of the Duke Start-Up Challenge.
For more information on Duke’s Health Sector Management program, be sure to visit the school’s website or check out the Health Sector Management section of the Clear Admit School Guide to Fuqua!
Posted by Clear Admit on August 20, 2007, at 3:38 pm
Posted in: Events For those of you who have yet to tackle the GMAT, we wanted to alert you to a free seminar hosted in center city Philadelphia tomorrow night by ManhattanGMAT. Long-time ManhattanGMAT teacher Andrew Yang will conduct a two hour seminar on the myths surrounding the GMAT and practical strategies for success on the test. Andrew is an excellent teacher who consistently earns praise for his engaging, informative classroom style, so this is sure to be a worthwhile event if you are in the Philadelphia area tomorrow evening.
Registration is limited, and so sign up now to ensure your space:
http://www.manhattangmat.com/EventShow.cfm?EID=3&eventID=1553
Posted by Clear Admit on August 20, 2007, at 12:33 pm
Posted in: Deadlines , School: Northwestern / Kellogg Though Kellogg released their MBA application essays some time ago, the school has just recently announced its deadlines for the 2007-2008 admissions season. Part I of the application includes the data form, an interview request (either on- or off-campus) and the application fee. Part II of Kellogg’s application are the remaining materials of a release of contact information, transcripts, essays, resume, the school’s honor code and two recommendations.
As interviews are a required part of Kellogg’s admissions process, the adcom has broken up the deadlines for Part I of the application based on an applicant’s desired location for an interview. For off-campus interviews, applicants should check the appropriate box in Part I and expect up to a 6-week wait during the peak period of November to March for their interview assignment via e-mail. In some cases of high demand or remote location, the adcom may not be able to schedule an off-campus interview. In these rare cases, applicants are given an interview waiver, which does not negatively influence one’s candidacy. If choosing an on-campus interview, applicants should allow two business days after submitting Part I before contacting the admissions office directly to schedule the interview.
Part I must be submitted before interview requests can be made. Part II is due by 11:59pm CDT.
Round 1
Part I & Off-campus Interview Request Submitted by: October 5th, 2007
Part I & On-campus Interview Request Submitted by: October 19th, 2007
On-campus Interview Scheduled by: December 17th, 2007
Part II Deadline: October 19th, 2007
Decision By: January 7th, 2008
Round 2
Part I & Off-campus Interview Request Submitted by: December 21st, 2007
Part I & On-campus Interview Request Submitted by: January 11th, 2008
On-campus Interview Scheduled by: March 3rd, 2008
Part II Deadline: January 11th, 2008
Decision By: March 31st, 2008
Round 3
Part I & Off-campus Interview Request Submitted by: February 22nd, 2008
Part I & On-campus Interview Request Submitted by: March 7th, 2008
On-campus Interview Scheduled by: April 21st, 2008
Part II Deadline: March 7th, 2008
Decision By: May 12th, 2008
Posted by Clear Admit on August 20, 2007, at 8:36 am
Posted in: MBA News , Rankings , School: Northwestern / Kellogg The annual U.S. News & World Report rankings of undergraduate colleges and universities hit news stands today and is already generating criticism from schools, students and other commentators. Although the controversy is not unusual, this year’s debate adds a twist that could impact the magazine’s graduate business school rankings in the coming years. The story started this spring, when leaders of many small liberal arts colleges joined together to boycott the U.S. News & World Report reputation survey, which accounts for 25% of the undergraduate rankings. A similar survey is used in the business school rankings, and asks top academic officials to rate schools based on their personal opinions of the programs. Critics call the reputation survey a self-perpetuating cycle, since a school’s place in the rankings impacts public perception of its quality, which is then reflected in the results of the next year’s reputation survey. At the undergraduate level, response rates for this year’s survey dropped to an all time low, raising even more questions about the usefulness of this measure in evaluating schools. Although the anti-rankings backlash is still strongest at the undergraduate level, most graduate programs are watching the battle carefully. Says Kate Will of the Annapolis Group, “I don’t think there is anyone in higher education who is not thinking about this issue.”
In other news, Kellogg announced recently that it will add a global course requirement to its MBA curricula, effective June 2008. The requirement will apply to the all of the school’s MBA programs (full-time, part-time and executive) and Dean Dipak Jain says it is part of Kellogg’s mission to develop “leaders equipped to thrive in the challenging global business landscape.” Some courses expected to count towards the new requirement include Cross-Cultural Negotiation, Global Initiatives in Management (discussed in an April Trivia Tuesday column), International Business Strategy, International Finance, and International Marketing. It seems likely that the new policy will generate continued growth in Kellogg’s international offerings, as students seek out relevant courses through which to fulfill the requirement.
Posted by Clear Admit on August 17, 2007, at 5:17 pm
Posted in: Rankings Forbes has just released their biennial ranking of MBA programs. This somewhat unorthodox ranking is based solely on ROI (return on investment). In other words, Forbes looks at MBA program costs, students’ foregone income and graduates’ wages to determine where MBAs get the most bang for their buck.
Check out their web site for a complete list of rankings and a host of related articles and interviews.
The top 10 full-time U.S. programs are as follows:
1. Dartmouth/Tuck
2. Stanford
3. Harvard
4. UVA/Darden
5. UPenn/Wharton
6. Columbia
7. Chicago
8. Yale
9. Northwestern/Kellogg
10. Cornell/Johnson
Although the top ten schools remain the same as in 2005, there has been some movement within this group. Darden, Harvard and Staford each shifted up several spaces since the last ranking, while Tuck remained Forbes’s best return on investment.
Posted by Clear Admit on August 17, 2007, at 12:45 pm
Posted in: Fridays from the Frontline Welcome back to Fridays from the Frontline, where we sum up new and noteworthy posts from the MBA blogosphere. With the end of summer drawing near, we find some bloggers getting ready for a new school year and others approaching the thick of admissions season. Let’s check in and see what we find:
While many applicant bloggers reported progress this week, the majority seemed to wish they had accomplished even more than they did. Mbabound08 chipped away at the Kellogg essays, and Dreamer took on ISB’s essay set. Meanwhile, it was Harvard’s essay set that was looming ahead for Chaos, last he checked in. Essay writers might want to take a look at what Wannabe had to say about word limits last week.
On the GMAT front, Miss Curly Bee was disappointed with the results of her latest practice test, while Achilles shared some tough practice questions with his readers. Kudos go to Seagull, who wisely began the process of familiarizing her international recommenders with the American admissions process. And last but not least, Bluetulip shared her thoughts on applying in July to INSEAD’s January intake program.
Turning to the student side, there was much excitement among first year bloggers this week, as many of them arrived in new cities and began getting oriented. Bancaku set up shop in Boston in preparation for his first day at Sloan, and Iday arrived in Chicago direct from Chennai (with luggage intact!). Sounding a bit out of breath from all their orientation activities, Hairtwirler checked in from Georgetown and UniQPath posted about the whirlwind that is Wharton’s Pre-Term. In upstate New York, scarecrow got acquainted at Johnson, and m@ sounded cheerful as he set out on his M-Trek with spiffy Ross binders in hand.
MaybeMBA was still working out the kinks in her plans to move to Chicago, while Dee took a brief moment away from partying to worry about the logistical matters that await her at INSEAD (like opening a bank account, and speaking French). On a more inquisitive note, RusGirl had some interesting points to make about the LBS practice of verifying admitted students’ references as late as July and August.
Bloggers returning for their second year sounded a little less frenzied than those above (except for John, who finished his CBS summer term and flew off to Vietnam). Karlitos shared some concerns over job availability after graduation, but remained calm and put his analytical skills to work. Rubeo Boy shared some reflections on transitioning back to Stern after a summer with Disney. Lastly, we’d like to point first year LBS students towards Angel Angie’s blog, where she offers some helpful hints to newcomers.
That just about does it for this week’s Fridays from the Frontline. Best wishes to those beginning a new school year this week, and as always, lots of encouragement to all the applicants out there!
Posted by Clear Admit on August 17, 2007, at 8:20 am
Posted in: Essay Topic Analysis , School: Harvard Harvard has made some significant adjustments to their essay structure this year. Whereas in years past, the program has posed as many as seven questions that they required that all applicants answer, this year HBS is requiring only five essays in total. Moreover, the application includes only two prompts to which all applicants must respond, allowing applicants to choose three of six topics for the remaining essays. This makes the HBS application a bit easier to complete in terms of volume of writing, and also allows applicants more flexibility to play on their strengths.
Let’s take a look at each of the questions:
Essay 1: What are your three most substantial accomplishments and why do you view them as such? (600-word limit)
This essay question has been a key component of the HBS application for many years, and its new spot at the top of the essay set (it’s been the second question on the list in years prior) only increases its prominence. Because this question could be the first element of your file that the adcom reads, this is a great opportunity to present the reader with three strong stories that introduce the major themes of your candidacy. Each accomplishment can be presented as a stand-alone section here, so you needn’t be overly concerned about composing a seamless narrative.
HBS has traditionally been very impact-oriented in evaluating applicants’ credentials, so one way to determine which three accomplishments to describe in this essay is often to think about the end results. Experiences in which you made a lasting and quantifiable impact can lend themselves to concise representation, and considering that each accomplishment must be described in approximately 200 words, this can be an important consideration. However, this isn’t to say that the process followed, skills gained, and lessons learned along the way aren’t important, too; these factors could be a great way to address the second half of the question: why you view these accomplishments as your most significant to date.
A final point is that it’s also important to make a well-balanced selection. An applicant who describes two professional successes and one extra-curricular accomplishment, or perhaps one each from the professional, academic and activities realms, can show that he or she excels in any environment.
Essay 2: What have you learned from a mistake? (400-word limit)
The subject of failure or setback is a popular one for business school essays in general, but this is a new topic for Harvard this year. There are a few important elements to consider in addressing this prompt. Firstly, professional maturity, self-reflection and insight are key qualities to communicate. Towards that end, successful essays will describe the mistake in straightforward, step-by-step detail, and will also own the misstep rather than making excuses.
Another important element to touch on is that you’ve experienced some growth or development since the initial mistake. While applicants should not ‘gloss over’ their mistakes, it is important to emphasize positive growth and the learning experience that can come from missing the mark. An effective essay will present this growth in terms of thoughts and feelings, while balancing comments about internal reflections with descriptions of more external actions and changes in behavior.
Please respond to three of the following (400-word limit each):
3a. Discuss a defining experience in your leadership development. How did this experience highlight your strengths and weaknesses?
These were once two separate questions on the HBS application, so a key challenge here will be to convey the needed information in a mere 400 words. Remember that detailed examples tend to make strong impressions on the reader, and while one could conceivably discuss his or her tenure in a certain role or position over time, a stronger approach may be to cover one specific event or instance. This way, you can set the scene and fully describe your actions, as well as the results. Note that because this is a defining experience, there should be a change in the applicant’s leadership skills, approach or perspective between the beginning and end of the story.
3b. How have you experienced culture shock?
While INSEAD has asked a question about culture shock for years, this is a new topic for Harvard, and along with a related addition to Wharton’s application, might suggest that American MBA programs are taking an increasing interest in students’ ability to navigate unfamiliar or even unfriendly environments.
In this case, ‘culture shock’ can refer to a jarring experience in a new country or environment. This is a great essay choice for applicants who have had significant cross-cultural experiences: someone who has worked overseas or relocated abroad permanently for school or other reasons. One may also experience culture without physically relocating, as in the case of learning how to negotiate the disparate expectations between international members of the same team. While international travel might also be a viable topic, this will not necessarily stand out from others in the applicant pool.
Of course, a valuable part of culture shock is the insight and growth that takes place after one get one’s bearings, so many of the best essays incorporate a healthy dose of lessons learned. Applicants aiming to make an impact on the reader might also keep in mind that indicating that cultural adjustment can be fraught with trial and error rather than sugar-coating a response and failing to outline the struggles or periods of adjustment. This essay question offers a good opportunity for an applicant to demonstrate cultural flexibility, offering evidence for his or her ability to operate as a global citizen and work in diverse teams.
3c. What would you like the MBA Admissions Board to know about your undergraduate academic experience?
While MBA applicants often draw upon their extracurricular experiences during college as topics for essays, it’s rare that they get a chance to talk about their more intellectual interests and achievements. This is your chance to go into some detail about why you chose your school and major, and tell the admissions committee about your academic interests and educational milestones. A great essay will underscore an applicant’s intelligence and work ethic, as well as incorporate some element of leadership (especially if the applicant had a significant impact on the department or school as a whole).
3d. What is your career vision and why is this choice meaningful to you?
Always unique among b-schools, HBS not only frames its essay about the applicant’s professional future in terms of a broad vision rather than concrete goals, but also makes it optional.
Harvard’s adcom tries to identify strong leaders, so applicants presenting a directed vision will make a positive impression. Because this essay is about your career vision, you might summarize your past experiences in a very concise manner (i.e. just a few sentences) before moving on to a detailed discussion of your future plans and the reasons that these plans are meaningful to you. See our tips on career goals essays for some general advice here. Of course, you might also touch on the ways in which HBS will help you achieve your vision. Think about how Harvard’s program (specific classes, classmates and clubs) would prepare you for your future.
3e. What global issue is most important to you and why?
Despite the broad-ranging and somewhat philosophical tone of this question, strong essays are often routed in detailed anecdotes rather than abstract beliefs. One great way to approach this question is to look back across the academic, professional and extracurricular elements of one’s candidacy to identify themes or interests that surface in multiple areas. This allows the applicant to point to ways in which he or she has demonstrated a commitment to an issue or set of issues.
The other approach is more oriented towards the future, for applicants who have very detailed and directed plans for addressing a particular global issue while at HBS or thereafter. With the right level of focus, this response could work nicely in tandem with – or in place of – the career vision essay.
3f. What else would you like the MBA Admissions Board to understand about you?
This essay isn’t the place to cover that low GMAT score or explain the absence of a recommendation from a current supervisor; the Harvard application has an “Additional Information” section that is best used for such short explanations. Rather, this essay is a place to highlight some element of your experience, activities or background that is important to your profile but hasn’t come out in response to any of the other questions posed in the application. Think carefully about the big picture of your candidacy – both in terms of past experiences and the way you could contribute to class discussions and the school community – to determine if there’s anything missing from your file. It’s also important to think about unique achievements or experiences that might help you to stand out in Harvard’s high caliber applicant pool.
Posted by Clear Admit on August 16, 2007, at 2:22 pm
Posted in: Essay Topics , School: NYU Stern NYU’s Stern School of Business has published their MBA application essays for the upcoming admissions season. While the content is the same as last year, applicants have a bit more room this year to delve into their goals in Essay 1.
Essay 1 – Professional Aspirations (750 word maximum):
Think about the decisions you have made in your life. Answer the following:
(a) What choices have you made that led you to your current position?
(b) Why pursue an MBA at this point in your life?
(c) What is your career goal upon graduation from NYU Stern? What is your long-term career goal?
Essay 2 – Fit with Stern (500 words maximum):
The NYU Stern community is one of our strongest assets. Please answer the following questions about community:
(a) What is your personal experience with the Stern community? What actions have you taken to learn more about us?
(b) How would you contribute to our community as a student?
(c) How will you benefit personally and professionally from the Stern community?
Essay 3 – Personal Expression (500 words maximum, if written):
Please describe yourself to your MBA classmates. You may use almost any method to convey your message (e.g. words, illustrations). Feel free to be creative.
Essay 4 – Additional Information (optional):
Please provide any additional information that you would like to bring to the attention of the Admissions Committee. This may include current or past gaps in employment, your undergraduate record, plans to retake the GMAT and/or TOEFL or any other relevant information.
As a reminder, here are NYU’s deadlines for the upcoming season!
Posted by Clear Admit on August 16, 2007, at 6:23 am
Posted in: General , Workbook Wednesdays Here is the answer to yesterday’s Challenge Question, brought to you by Manhattan GMAT!
Question
This week’s challenge problem is a Data Sufficiency question.
If P, Q, R, and S are positive integers, and , is R divisible by 5 ?
(1) P is divisible by 140
(2) , where x is a positive integer
(A) Statement (1) alone is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
(B) Statement (2) alone is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
(C) BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
(D) Each statement ALONE is sufficient.
(E) Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
Answer
Let’s begin by analyzing the information given to us in the question:
If P, Q, R, and S are positive integers, and , is R divisible by 5 ?It is often helpful on the GMAT to rephrase equations so that there are no denominators. We can do this my cross-multiplying as follows:

Now let’s analyze Statement (1) alone: P is divisible by 140.
Most GMAT divisibility problems can be solved by breaking numbers down to their prime factors (this is called a “prime factorization”).
The prime factorization of 140 is: .
Thus, if P is divisible by 140, it is also divisible by all the prime factors of 140. We know that P is divisible by 2 twice, by 5, and by 7. However, this gives us no information about R so Statement (1) is not sufficient to answer the question.
Next, let’s analyze Statement (2) alone: , where x is a positive integer.
From this, we can see that the prime factorization of Q looks something like this: Therefore, we know that 7 is the only prime factor of Q. However, this gives us no information about R so Statement (2) is not sufficient to answer the question.
Finally, let’s analyze both statements taken together:
From Statement (1), we know that P has 5 as one of its prime factors. Since 5 is a factor of P and since P is a factor of PS, then by definition, 5 is a factor of PS.
Recall that the question told us that . From this, we can deduce that PS must have the same factors as QR. Since 5 is a factor of PS, 5 must also be a factor of QR.
From Statement (2), we know that 7 is the only prime factor of Q. Therefore, we know that 5 is NOT a factor of Q. However, we know that 5 must be a factor of QR. The only way this can be the case is if 5 is a factor of R.
Thus, by combining both statements we can answer the question: Is R divisible by 5? Yes, it must be divisible by 5. Since BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient, the correct answer is C.
Posted by Clear Admit on August 15, 2007, at 3:50 pm
Posted in: General , MBA News We wanted to take a moment to point out two recent Business Week articles that touch on the idea of making business school more accessible. First, the magazine posted a comprehensive list of resources for international students who are stymied by the thought of financing an American MBA. With yearly tuition costs ranging from $20,000 to $47,000, many overwhelmed applicants are in great need of guidance, not to mention loans. Business Week’s annotated list of top internet resources, along with advice about how best to communicate with schools’ financial aid offices, may help bring prospective international students a little closer to the goal of earning an MBA in the U.S.
Another recent article looks at the issue of accessibility as it pertains to business faculty and their role in conducting research and contributing scholarship to their fields. More specifically, the subject of the debate is whether or not there is value in academic research that is not immediately applicable to current business practitioners. AACSB, the business school accreditation organization, recently published a draft of a report emphasizing the importance of applicability, prompting academics and administrators at member schools to reexamine the issue. One common concern is that realigning academic research toward the immediate needs of practitioners in the business world could limit business academics’ intellectual freedom and exploration. While critics suggest the AACSB’s goals would have a stagnating affect on theory and practice alike, supporters argue that students are best served by faculty researchers who educate them about the ‘real’ world of business that awaits them upon graduation.
As applicants gather impressions about their target schools, they may find that exploring the research interests of individual faculty members is a great way to gain a deeper understanding of the intellectual climate at each school. Further, students might find that opportunities for learning extend beyond a school’s formal course offerings if faculty interests happen to be aligned with their own.
|